This series, being showed in Ireland for the first time and named after the island resort of Eleuthera in the Caribbean, stands out for its surprising figuration, which seems to represent Scully’s radical break with an artistic approach he has consistently pursued since the 1970s. But in fact, Scully worked simultaneously and independently on both the figurative pictures of his eight-year-old son Oisín and his abstract geometric paintings. Products based on either one of these two forms of expression were created virtually side by side, in the same studio: on the one hand, the many variations of a picture composed of vertical and horizontal strips and beams, with which Scully experimentally explores the fragile relationship between load-bearing and resting elements, between states of floating and being supported, in all its formal and coloristic possibilities; and, on the other hand, Scully’s series Eleuthera as contemporary interpretation of a child’s portrait in the mode of concrete and figurative painting.
 
So this baffling duality in Scully’s oeuvre is not rooted in a disruptive stylistic development but in the artist’s response to the bliss in this boy’s straightforward world. Today Scully uses two modes of expression in his painting: the figurative approach he relies on for the pictures of his son is linked to issues regarding the artist’s identity as a father and observer, whereas the painter continues his investigation into the universal and existentially understood forces of horizontality and verticality.
 
The apparent stylistic rupture is therefore indebted to the motif as such: the intimate subject of the artist’s contemplation. It is his second son, born late in the artist’s life, whom Scully observed playing on the beach for hours and days on end, years after the tragic fatal accident of his first child. The boy is evidently a motif Scully could by no means have approached with his geometric compositional principles, his signature style, without violating the intimate family bliss. This new “realism” is certainly no return to the artist’s concrete beginnings under the impact of German Expressionism. Scully had soon left behind the realism of his years at the art academy. But even with his most abstract paintings he still displays moods and impressions he remembered or things he experienced. Many objects are first captured in the form of photographs and then undergo thorough transformation in the form of orthogonal beams and strips.
 
The most important point of reference for Scully’s most recent series is the work of Henri Matisse. Similar to the Frenchman, Scully uses color in a way that is detached from the example of nature; he is not enslaved to visual perception. He suggests heat with the aid of color and chromatic temperature instead of modeling it with light and shade.
 
Scully shows his son sitting on the beach, erecting an embankment around himself in the form of a moat. The child is protected from the strong Caribbean sunlight by a T-shirt and hat or by a towel tied to create a turban. Scully has painted with a broad brush on aluminum, a support that does not absorb the paint, which stands out visibly on the surface of the picture. In the studio he has abstracted the original motif—his son, immersed in his serious play—by removing all fleeting detail. Scully does not paint in front of the motif, for he is not an Impressionist or naturalist. Oisín is recognizably surrounded by water, toys, and sand, but nevertheless everything in the picture follows a law of abstraction by which the unique sense of this idyll can be captured all the more deeply. For all that has been said, Eleuthera is thus one of the most significant artistic manifestations of the genre of “children’s portraiture.”